A bipartisan congressional commission has raised a sharp warning: China’s significant advances in quantum communication technology — underpinned by state-directed coordination — pose a national security threat to the United States. According to the U.S.–China Economic and Security Review Commission’s 2025 annual report, Beijing’s progress in quantum networks means familiar cryptographic systems could soon be vulnerable. The report cites China’s central planning as a key reason for its lead. With quantum computers theoretically able to break current encryption, the U.S. finds itself in a race where the adversary may already be ahead.
Key Takeaways
– China’s state-driven push in quantum communications and computing puts the U.S. at a potential disadvantage in cryptography, intelligence and cybersecurity.
– The U.S. government is being encouraged to adopt a “Quantum First” national goal by 2030, to rebuild leadership in quantum hardware, software and networks.
– The threat is not purely technical: China’s leverage over advanced technologies and supply chains has geopolitical consequences, from sensitive communications to national infrastructure.
In-Depth
The latest report from the U.S.–China Economic and Security Review Commission paints a stark picture: the quantum technology race isn’t a distant sci-fi scenario — it’s here, and Beijing may already have the jump on Washington. This growing concern is not just about bragging rights; it’s about securing America’s digital and national security architecture in a world where quantum-based threats could become very real, and very fast.
At the heart of the issue is quantum communication technology — networks built on principles of quantum mechanics, promising theoretically unhackable channels. The commission warns China’s centralized planning and massive resource allocation have helped it advance rapidly in this space. Meanwhile, the U.S., while home to heavy hitters in the quantum computing industry, is essentially playing catch-up when it comes to deploying quantum networks for secure communications. The danger: that an adversary could one day exploit quantum-capable systems to break today’s encryption, access sensitive data, or undermine communications infrastructure — that is, engage in “harvest now, decrypt later” operations.
From a national-security viewpoint, if China moves ahead in quantum communication and quantum computing, the implications are vast. Secure military and diplomatic transmissions, financial networks, critical infrastructure — all currently relying on conventional encryption — could become vulnerable. The commission’s report underscores this very threat and urges Congress to treat quantum technologies not as an academic curiosity but as core national capability. Among the highlighted priorities: major investment in quantum hardware and software, cultivating talent, and establishing a clear “Quantum First” strategy by 2030.
Adding to the urgency: quantum technologies overlap with strategic industries like defense, cybersecurity and advanced computing. China’s ambitions in quantum aren’t isolated; they dovetail with efforts to dominate AI, biotech, semiconductors and space. That interlocking of high-tech sectors raises the stakes for U.S. strategic posture. If America allows China to consolidate its lead in quantum networks, it risks not only a technological lag but a strategic one — where power flows from who can secure, control or disrupt data and communications.
The report also flags complacency in private investment: one quantum-networking startup CEO said the U.S. missed early momentum because of cautious signals from agencies such as the NSA, discouraging investment in quantum communication networks. That hesitation matters: while quantum computing gets headlines, quantum communication networks represent both a defense and offensive frontier. The U.S. government, industry and academia are being asked to move faster, coordinate better and treat quantum systems as mission-critical.
In sum, the message is simple yet sobering: the quantum race is no longer theoretical. China is making meaningful progress. The U.S. must respond with urgency — investing, coordinating and acting strategically — or risk falling behind in an arena with very real national-security implications.