There is a growing sector of social apps designed to help people forge platonic connections rather than romantic ones. These platforms lean on interest-based matching, event coordination, and AI nudges to ease the awkwardness of meeting new friends. Some of the highlighted apps include 222, Timeleft, Pie (with AI), and Meetup’s more event-centric model. The shift reflects a broader push to tackle loneliness via technology — with mixed results: while algorithms can suggest potential matches, human follow-through and willingness to engage remain critical.
Sources: VOX, TechCrunch
Key Takeaways
– These “friend-making” apps use algorithms and structured prompts (e.g. shared interests, AI suggestions) to reduce social friction and introduce people with genuine compatibility.
– Despite tech facilitation, success depends heavily on the user’s willingness to act — algorithms may present matches, but building a friendship still requires follow-through.
– The rise of these platforms signals an acknowledgment of loneliness as a social challenge, and a strategic pivot from purely dating apps toward broader social connection tools.
In-Depth
In our increasingly connected yet isolated world, loneliness has become a real pain point—for many people, it’s not dating they’re missing, but companionship. The recent TechCrunch piece observes that a wave of “friendship apps” is emerging to meet that need. Unlike traditional dating apps, these platforms aim to facilitate platonic relationships, using algorithms, shared interests, event planning, and even AI nudges to ease entry into new social circles.
One standout is 222, which invites users to express interest in forming friendships through lightweight prompts and then nudges them to follow up. Another is Timeleft, which is event-focused, encouraging people to meet in real life over shared activities. TechCrunch also points out Pie, devised by Andy Dunn, which blends AI to assist in introducing people who might click. And then there’s the familiar Meetup, which leans on in-person events around shared topics, allowing connection through experience rather than just profiles.
These apps differ in approach but share a core assumption: the hardest part of making friends is the opening. So they aim to lower the entry barriers—filtering by interest, prompting follow-ups, reducing guesswork, and in some cases, using AI to suggest who you might want to message. That said, it’s not a magic solution. Business Insider’s reporting warns that algorithms are no substitute for actual effort: you might get dozens of “matches,” but if you don’t message, attend meetups, or show up regularly, nothing changes. The tech can present opportunity, but human follow-through remains decisive.
Moreover, the growing interest in these apps reflects cultural shifts. Dating apps have long dominated the personal connections space, but people are now acknowledging nonromantic isolation as its own crisis. By expanding beyond “who should I date?” to “who might I befriend?”, these platforms are adapting to deeper social needs.
In short, these apps won’t guarantee you a new best friend, but they offer a more structured, lower-pressure way to explore connections. Their success will likely depend less on perfect matching engines and more on whether people use them consistently, stay open to vulnerability, and take small social risks.