Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    OpenAI Debuts ChatGPT Health With Medical Records, Wellness App Integration

    January 13, 2026

    Tech Firms Tackle Backlash by Redesigning Data Centers to Win Over Communities

    January 13, 2026

    Utah Launches First-Ever AI Prescription Pilot in the U.S., Sparking Debate on Safety and Innovation

    January 13, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Tech
    • AI News
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest VKontakte
    TallwireTallwire
    • Tech

      Tech Firms Tackle Backlash by Redesigning Data Centers to Win Over Communities

      January 13, 2026

      OpenAI Debuts ChatGPT Health With Medical Records, Wellness App Integration

      January 13, 2026

      Malicious Chrome Extensions Compromise 900,000 Users’ AI Chats and Browsing Data

      January 12, 2026

      Wearable Health Tech Could Create Over 1 Million Tons of E-Waste by 2050

      January 12, 2026

      Viral Reddit Food Delivery Fraud Claim Debunked as AI Hoax

      January 12, 2026
    • AI News
    TallwireTallwire
    Home»Tech»Lenovo’s Lena AI Chatbot Caught Spilling Secrets
    Tech

    Lenovo’s Lena AI Chatbot Caught Spilling Secrets

    Updated:December 25, 20252 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Lenovo’s Lena AI Chatbot Caught Spilling Secrets
    Lenovo’s Lena AI Chatbot Caught Spilling Secrets
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Lenovo’s AI-powered customer service chatbot, Lena, has been found vulnerable to a cleverly crafted prompt injection that allowed attackers to steal active session cookies and hijack support agent accounts. Cybernews researchers demonstrated how a single 400-character prompt, disguised as a regular request (like asking for product specs), could trick Lena into outputting HTML—including malicious script instructions—that, when rendered by a browser, exfiltrated session cookies to an external server. This opens the door to serious risks: impersonating agents, running system commands, installing backdoors, and lateral movement across the network. Lenovo has since patched the flaw, but experts warn this episode highlights a broader issue: the tendency of chatbots to obey any instruction unless aggressive sanitization and verification measures are enforced.

    Sources: TechRadar, Security Boulevard, WebPro News

    Key Takeaways

    – Single-prompt XSS exploit: A single cleverly hidden instruction inside a normal-sounding query triggered a cross-site scripting attack that leaked session cookies.

    – Broader AI vulnerability: The case underscores how generative AI systems, if not correctly sandboxed and filtered, can turn from helpful agents into internal security threats.

    – Urgent need for hardening: The incident serves as a warning for enterprises to implement strict input/output sanitization, robust verification, and sandboxing for AI-driven customer support systems.

    In-Depth

    Lenovo’s Lena chatbot was simply doing its job—answering customer queries—until researchers at Cybernews turned its helpfulness into a vulnerability. They crafted a 400-character prompt: part innocuous customer request, part hidden malicious payload.

    By instructing the chatbot to format its response in HTML, they embedded a script that caused a browser to send session cookies to a remote server when the placeholder image failed to load. That session cookie was essentially a golden key—it allowed attackers to impersonate customer support agents without needing login credentials, potentially enabling them to access private chats, execute system-level commands, or even plant backdoors.

    Lenovo has patched the vulnerability, but what makes this episode alarming is how easily it was triggered. Large language models are inherently “people-pleasers,” apt to follow any instruction—even malicious ones—unless confined by rigorous guardrails. As AI tools permeate enterprise workflows, this incident underscores how imperative it is to treat AI output as untrusted, enforce strict content sanitization, and require rigorous vetting of generated content. What’s more, enterprises should adopt a “never trust, always verify” stance toward AI responses, just as they would any external input in their system.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleLegal Storm Brews Over Roblox Safety as Parents File Suits, Platform Responds
    Next Article Libby’s New ‘Inspire Me’ AI Feature Sparks Concern Over Human-Curated Book Discovery

    Related Posts

    Tech Firms Tackle Backlash by Redesigning Data Centers to Win Over Communities

    January 13, 2026

    OpenAI Debuts ChatGPT Health With Medical Records, Wellness App Integration

    January 13, 2026

    Malicious Chrome Extensions Compromise 900,000 Users’ AI Chats and Browsing Data

    January 12, 2026

    Wearable Health Tech Could Create Over 1 Million Tons of E-Waste by 2050

    January 12, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Editors Picks

    Tech Firms Tackle Backlash by Redesigning Data Centers to Win Over Communities

    January 13, 2026

    OpenAI Debuts ChatGPT Health With Medical Records, Wellness App Integration

    January 13, 2026

    Malicious Chrome Extensions Compromise 900,000 Users’ AI Chats and Browsing Data

    January 12, 2026

    Wearable Health Tech Could Create Over 1 Million Tons of E-Waste by 2050

    January 12, 2026
    Top Reviews
    Tallwire
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube
    • Tech
    • AI News
    © 2026 Tallwire. Optimized by ARMOUR Digital Marketing Agency.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.