The U.K.’s new Online Safety Act mandates strict age verification—like face scans or ID checks—for adult content, including pornography and harmful material on platforms such as social media and messaging apps. This has unexpectedly punished compliant websites: traffic to sites following the rules has dropped significantly, while those that ignore them are seeing up to triple the usual visits. Enforcement is led by Ofcom, with fines or even blocking possible for non‑compliance, though some non‑compliant sites are thriving in the short term amid growing privacy concerns and user frustration.
Sources: PC Gamer, TechCrunch, LiveMint
Key Takeaways
– Traffic loss for compliant platforms: Sites implementing age checks are suffering substantial decreases in visitor numbers, impacting revenue and engagement.
– Non‑compliance rewarded (temporarily): Sites that ignore the regulations are currently drawing more traffic—some reports suggest up to a 3× increase.
– Regulatory tension ahead: Ofcom may act against non‑compliant sites, but balancing enforcement with digital rights and privacy remains a significant challenge.
In-Depth
Since July, the U.K.’s Online Safety Act has ushered in sweeping age verification mandates intended to shield minors from adult or harmful online content. These laws require platforms—ranging from porn sites to social media apps—to employ rigorous checks like facial recognition, passport or driver’s license scans, and even credit card verification for access to restricted material.
Though well‑intentioned, this law is already triggering unintended consequences. Sites that comply are watching their traffic shrink fast, and in some cases, by orders of magnitude. Meanwhile, rivals that flout the rules are gaining ground—their traffic has reportedly skyrocketed, with some seeing three times more visits than before.
This dynamic creates a perverse market incentive: compliance becomes costly and punishing, while ignoring the law temporarily boosts visibility and ad revenue. Yet regulators aren’t letting that continue unchecked. Ofcom is actively investigating and has the authority to fine non‑compliant providers, potentially even block them within the UK.
That said, critics argue that this regulatory push raises serious privacy concerns. Age verification systems often require sensitive personal data, and users worry about data storage, misuse, and exposure. Meanwhile, tech-savvy users are turning to VPNs or choosing platforms that simply don’t verify — further complicating enforcement.
In essence, while safeguarding our children online is undeniably important, the current implementation of the law may be undermining that goal by unintentionally steering users toward less safe corners of the web—and creating a regulatory paradox that authorities will need to address sooner rather than later.

