French lawmakers are set to begin debating a draft law to ban access to social media platforms for children under the age of 15, with the proposal backed strongly by President Emmanuel Macron and aiming for implementation by September 2026. The move mirrors Australia’s recently enacted world-first ban on under-16s and reflects mounting official concern about excessive screen time, exposure to harmful content, and mental health issues affecting minors. In addition to the social media age limit, the draft bill includes expanded restrictions on mobile phone use in high schools on top of existing bans in primary and middle schools. Proponents cite studies linking platform usage to cyberbullying, disrupted sleep, and broader online harms, while critics raise questions about enforcement, privacy implications of age verification technologies, and the potential stifling of youth engagement in digital society. As the debate gets underway in the French Parliament and legal checks proceed, France’s initiative could influence digital policy debates across Europe and beyond.
Sources:
https://www.france24.com/en/france/20251231-france-to-debate-social-media-ban-for-children-under-15
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/dec/31/france-plans-social-media-ban-for-under-15s-from-september-2026
https://www.reuters.com/world/france-aims-ban-under-15s-social-media-september-2026-le-monde-reports-2025-12-31/
Key Takeaways:
- France is moving forward with legislative debate on a social media ban for citizens under 15, drawing inspiration from Australia’s under-16 policy.
- The proposed framework couples age verification and limitations on social platforms with broader school mobile device restrictions as part of youth protections.
- The initiative has stirred discussion over balancing child safety with personal freedoms, enforcement practicality, and digital rights.
In-Depth
France is gearing up to embark on one of the most ambitious digital policy shifts seen in a major Western democracy in recent years: a proposed ban on social media access for children under the age of 15. This initiative, championed by President Emmanuel Macron and set to be formally debated in the French Parliament, represents a significant effort by public officials to address what they describe as the mounting harms that unchecked social media usage can bring to young people’s development. The policy is expected to be part of a broader legislative package slated for implementation by September 2026.
The roots of this discussion trace back to growing public and political concern about the effects of smartphone and social media use on children’s mental health, academic performance, and overall well-being. In Australia, lawmakers enacted a world-first ban on under-16s’ access to platforms such as TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat, and YouTube in late 2025, prompting observers around the world to take notice. France’s proposed measure aims to follow this model while setting its own criteria and enforcement mechanisms. According to multiple sources, the French government’s draft bill includes not only the age restriction on social media use but also expanded mobile phone restrictions in secondary schools—building on existing bans for younger students.
President Macron’s support for the ban is grounded in a public framing that couples digital protection with broader social priorities. Government communications and draft legislation emphasize that excessive online engagement can expose minors to cyberbullying, inappropriate content, addictive algorithms, and disruptions to sleep patterns. These points reflect similar rationales cited by advocates of social media restrictions elsewhere. Macron and his allies have suggested that limiting access for younger teens will empower parents and educators to safeguard children’s formative years from what they see as the pernicious effects of algorithm-driven platforms.
However, the proposal has not been without controversy. Critics warn that enforcing such a ban presents technical and legal challenges. Age verification systems—potentially involving document checks or biometric technologies—raise privacy concerns and could inadvertently expand state and corporate surveillance capabilities. There are also questions about the practicality of keeping determined youths off pervasive digital platforms, given the availability of VPNs and other workarounds. Meanwhile, opponents argue that social media, if used wisely, can offer educational and social benefits that blanket bans might overlook.
The legislative process itself will serve as an important test of political will in Paris. The draft bill must undergo legal scrutiny by administrative bodies and face debate in a Parliament that remains deeply divided on many issues. France’s broader legal context includes the European Union’s Digital Services Act, which provides some latitude for member states to establish minimum age requirements for online services—a point that supporters of the proposal have highlighted to allay concerns about legal compatibility.
Public opinion appears to tilt in favor of stronger protections for young people online. Polling data has shown that a significant share of the French population supports measures to curb children’s access to social media. This sentiment aligns with wider European discussions about how to regulate Big Tech and digital platforms in the face of perceived harms to youth and society at large.
If France moves ahead with this policy, it could influence other countries contemplating similar steps. Denmark and Norway have already floated or initiated moves to ban social media for under-15s; policymakers in other regions are watching closely how France’s experiment unfolds. Proponents hope that a successful implementation will serve as a model for balancing child protection with respect for individual liberties in the digital age.
Yet the debate also underscores a deeper tension at the heart of modern technology policy: how to reconcile the widespread societal integration of digital platforms with the need to protect vulnerable populations without resorting to heavy-handed censorship or intrusive monitoring. As France’s Parliament grapples with this question in early 2026, the world will be watching a pivotal moment in the evolution of online governance and the rights of young internet users.

